The 2024 Copa America is in full swing, captivating fans worldwide with its blend of passion, skill, and drama. Yet, amidst the thrilling matches and unexpected results, a contentious debate has emerged: the size of the pitches. These changes along with temporary grass being used on the pitch that doesn't meet the standards of many of the world's best soccer players have caused some players and teams to speak against the field conditions.
While soccer pitches are traditionally known for their expansive dimensions, offering ample space for intricate passing, long-range shots, and dazzling displays of individual skill, the Copa America 2024 has taken a different approach. Several venues hosting matches are using smaller fields, barely meeting the minimum requirements set forth by FIFA.
The standard dimensions for an international soccer pitch are 105 meters long and 68 meters wide. However, some of the pitches used in the Copa America 2024 are as small as 100 meters long and 65 meters wide. This reduction in playing area, while seemingly minor, has sparked a fierce debate about the impact of field size on the style and quality of play. A smaller pitch leaves less room for open play, and instead encourages players to be more physical in a tighter space. While some enjoy the faster paced, more physical game, others have mentioned the lack of space takes away from the tactical approach to soccer, making the sport focus more on intensity and speed.
The issue stems from many of the pitches being used for the Copa America 2024 tournament are originally NFL fields which are narrower and shorter than standard FIFA pitches. Although the fields are shorter and more narrow than European soccer pitches, the sizes of the pitch still meets the range of acceptable size set forth by FIFA ranging between 100-110 meters long by 64-75 meters wide.
Many of the world's top soccer players, who are accustomed to playing on larger pitches, have voiced their concerns about the smaller dimensions. Lionel Messi, along with Di Maria have called the field a disaster. Players from Uruguay, Brazil, and even the US Men's National Team have all called out the fields for hindering their abilities and increasing their probabilities for being injured on the pitch.
These complaints from some of the game's biggest icons have resonated with fans and pundits alike. Many believe that the smaller fields are stifling creativity and encouraging a more direct, physical style of play. Some have even accused CONMEBOL, the South American football confederation, of prioritizing commercial interests over the quality of the game by opting for smaller fields that can accommodate more seats in the stadiums even though their high ticket prices have led to stadiums barely being half full.
The smaller fields have forced coaches to rethink their tactical approaches. Teams that typically rely on possession-based football, building from the back and patiently probing for openings, have found themselves struggling to implement their preferred style of play. The reduced space makes it easier for opponents to press and close down spaces, disrupting the flow of the game and forcing turnovers.
As a result, many teams have resorted to a more direct approach, bypassing the midfield and launching long balls towards their forwards. This has led to a more frantic and less aesthetically pleasing style of play, with fewer moments of individual brilliance and more scrappy, physical battles. We saw this in the final minutes of Mexico's match against Ecuador, where a deep pass up the pitch almost ended in a penalty being called for Mexico, possibly winning them the game. VAR confirmed it was not a penalty, allowing Ecuador to draw and head into the quarterfinals while Mexico was eliminated.
Another concern raised by players and coaches is the increased risk of injuries on smaller pitches. With less space to maneuver, players are more likely to collide with each other and less likely to have time to react and avoid tackles. This has led to a higher frequency of fouls and a greater risk of injuries, particularly to the legs and ankles.
The increased physicality of the game on smaller fields has raised questions about player welfare with some arguing that the smaller pitches are putting players at unnecessary risk, especially given the already demanding schedule of the Copa America tournament. With many players in the tournament set to return to their clubs in Europe and South America, players are mindful of the smaller pitches and take extra consideration when moving up the field.
The controversy surrounding the field size has not only affected the players and coaches but also the fans. Many have expressed their disappointment with the smaller pitches, arguing that they are detracting from the overall spectacle of the tournament. They long for the wide-open spaces that allow for breathtaking passing moves, long-range screamers, and mesmerizing displays of individual skill.
Some fans have even suggested that the smaller fields are giving an unfair advantage to certain teams, particularly those that are known for their physicality and directness. They believe that the smaller pitches are leveling the playing field, making it harder for technically gifted teams to express themselves and dominate matches.
The issues surrounding the pitch size is likely to leave a lasting impact on the legacy of the Copa America 2024. It will be remembered as the tournament where the quality of the pitches took center stage. While the smaller fields may have created a faster and more unpredictable tournament, they have also been criticized for stifling creativity, increasing the risk of injuries, and detracting from the overall spectacle of the game. As football continues to evolve, it is crucial that the governing bodies consider the impact of field size on the quality of play and the well-being of the players.
With the United States set to host the World Cup in 2026, the debate of the turf and pitch sizes will continue into the foreseeable future. After all, why should any field used in the Copa America or World Cup tournament be considered just because they barely meet the minimum requirement? There should be more than just the minimum requirement for tournaments of high caliber.
Live in New York and want to play in our soccer league? Click here for more info!
